P/cloudy
40°
P/cloudy
Hi 64° | Lo 44°

Letter: Bias showing

Usually The Recorder treats local news with some objectivity. I was taken aback, therefore, to see Anita Fritz’s lead article “Norman rewrites wetland ordinance.” I feel particularly entitled to be critical since I personally agree with the article’s viewpoint. I think a big box store would be a valuable addition to Greenfield and that the vocal opposition of Al Norman and his supporters has delayed, but probably not stopped, the construction of such a store.

Even the subhead of the article gives the bias away: “Before public hearing has even taken place, Town Council committee presents big box opponent’s revision of Conservation Commission proposal.” The word “even” is editorializing in a place where editorializing does not belong. And the first paragraph refers to a “known sprawlbuster,” implying that sprawlbusters are not much better than gangsters.

This is an editorial failure, not just a reporting failure. If a reporter writes an unduly biased article, it is the responsibility of the news editor to demand that it be rewritten.

PAUL ABRAHAMS

Deerfield

There are no comments yet. Be the first!
Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.