BOSTON — Residents all over Massachusetts are scheduled to absorb a significant decrease in food assistance aid in just over two weeks, with more than 630,000 households facing a loss of about a third of what they have received in SNAP benefits over the past two years.

As low-income families and individuals who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to put food on the table and make ends meet prepare for the reduction, the state Legislature has before them a proposal to continue, at least in part, the pandemic-era emergency SNAP allotments. But with the federal declaration that assistance tied to COVID-19 will be phased out this spring, the state has before it an aid cliff and slowing revenue growth to fill those gaps after several years of elevated spending.

Massachusetts residents have received extra SNAP dollars to help combat the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020. These additional payments were authorized by the first big federal pandemic package, at the time providing extra funds to about 60% of Massachusetts families, according to Victoria Negus of the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute.

In 2021, the Biden administration updated the policy guaranteeing all SNAP households at least $95 in extra funds. On average, the SNAP emergency allotment has added an additional $151 to a household’s normal monthly benefit of $335 in Massachusetts, according to the state Department of Transitional Assistance.

Around 630,000 households in Massachusetts have been receiving these extra benefits, which account for roughly $90 million in federal nutrition dollars flowing into the state each month, Negus said.

But, a year-end package approved by Congress in December disconnected the extra SNAP benefits from the end of the federal public health emergency, meaning the final federal payments are authorized for February 2023, three months before the federal public health emergency will come to a close in May.

Massachusetts issues these payments on the second business day of the month, so the final payment that households will receive with the extra federal dollars is coming up on March 2.

“The reality of these boosted payments during the pandemic is that SNAP has been able to meet more of a family’s food costs in a month. It’s really driven down food insecurity and increased the ability of families to make the healthiest choices for them, because they have had the dollars to do so,” Negus said. “Some demographics will feel the impact of the cliff to a greater degree than other families will.”

For around 200,000 households on SNAP that have no income, losing the average $97 per month to their normal benefit of $396 per month represents a 19.7% decrease in the amount they’ll have to spend on groceries.

For households with earned income, around 117,500 on SNAP in the state, their normal average benefit of $365 was boosted with an additional average $278 per month for the past two years. The end of the extra payments will mean a 43% decrease in their benefits.

Families with children under 5 years old had an average SNAP emergency allotment of $221 to add to a $586 normal monthly benefit, households with a member over 60 years old received on average an extra $132 to their $252 in monthly allowance, and homeless individuals and families got an extra $118 on average to their monthly $283 in normal monthly SNAP, according to the Department of Transitional Assistance.

“I heard from a mom, she has a family of four, a teen with Down syndrome and a disabled husband. She said, ‘This change will result in less healthy foods, a lower thermostat temperature and losing vital therapies for our youngest son along with a strain on utilities paid,’” Negus said.

Healey plan

To ease the transition from elevated aid levels, Gov. Maura Healey proposed a supplemental budget on Jan. 30 allocating $130 million to provide SNAP recipients with 40% of their previously enhanced allotment for another three months, which her office dubbed an “off-ramp” to the end of expanded benefits.

The governor’s bill would fund the $130 million with “repurposed enhanced federal Medicaid reimbursements, resulting in an approximately net $0 cost to the commonwealth,” her office said.

Massachusetts Taxpayers Association President Doug Howgate said the governor’s approach is a “good balance” of meeting the needs of low-income families and understanding the limits of the state budget.

“You want to provide some certainty, some predictability to families who are going to be dealing with a change in this federal benefit,” Howgate said. “At the same time, also understanding that the SNAP program, historically speaking, has been something that we in the state/federal partnership, rely on the federal government for. And we need to be mindful as we think about our state investments in vital areas like food security, picking up the federal SNAP program, it is not something that we can probably accommodate in our budget.”

With a roughly $90 million price tag for the extra SNAP funds each month, the yearly total of federal dollars coming into Massachusetts for the emergency relief is about $1.08 billion. If the state wanted to continue the program on its own, it would represent a major new commitment and require other changes in the state budget.

The federal payments have always been “temporary,” but Negus said the short time between the declaration that the extra funds are being phased out and the last enhanced check will leave families scrambling.

“Congress cut short these payments earlier than everybody — earlier than Massachusetts, certainly, was expecting,” she said. “Having those three extra months of boosted allotments, even at the 40% rate that was proposed, will give families the time they need to save and make case changes to maximize federal SNAP benefits.”

SNAP benefit amounts are tied to factors such as income, housing or shelter costs, child care, and if you have children, a disability or someone in your household over 60 years old, Negus said. Since everyone on SNAP has been receiving enhanced payments, many recipients have not updated their information, meaning they may be able to receive more than the amount they were getting in 2020 if their life circumstances have changed.

“Now that we have this really shortened time period, it’s much harder for everybody to be able to do that from an administrative standpoint,” she said. “Plus, the governor’s supplemental budget is critical as families need more food dollars to deal with the high cost of food right now.”

The budget was referred to the House’s temporary Ways and Means Committee on Jan. 31. With no movement on the topic in the Legislature in two weeks, Negus said she is hopeful that lawmakers will pass the governor’s supplemental budget before March 2 when the extra federal aid ends.

“I think that our Legislature understands economic realities facing low-income families across the commonwealth,” she said. “I think folks really understand the urgency of making sure families can put food on the table, and the value of these extra dollars.”

]]>