There's a far bigger difference between dollar coins and paper dollars than those discussed in this article; and a far dirtier story line, of underhand anti-coin activism at the Federal Reserve. Why do you think the 1979 Susan B. Anthony dollar was so similar to a quarter that its production soon had to be halted? Ex-Mint chairman Philip Diehl’s testimony as to the Fed creating “barriers” to distribution is at http://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hhrg-112-ba19-wstate-pdiehl-20121129.pdf.
Whenever the Treasury mints a $1 coin, it gains $1 minus the production cost--just as the Federal Reserve now garnishes $1 in assets for every $1 bill it issues, minus the printing cost. The transfer of these face-value profits in issuing all $1 denominations, from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury, will result in gains VASTLY in excess of those reported by the GAO, which are taken as true by the proponents of S. 1105. In other words, the case for the change to a $1 coin is FAR stronger than that which is being made by the bill's sponsors and advocates. In particular, there will be prompt multi-billion dollar gains, rather than the predicted start-up losses.
The difference is the subject of a lawsuit seeking findings of misrepresentation against the Treasury and GAO, now pending in the Ninth Circuit. See the articles "How The One Dollar Coin Can Cure The Economy" at http://www.opednews.com/articles/How-The-One-Dollar-Coin-Ca-by-Clifford-Johnson-130515-443.html. ...(full comment)
Just an FYI, Greenfield High School advertised this event and 15 students attended the event via the Green Room afterschool program which supplied a wonderful dinner and provided transportation to the movie. There were also 8 staff members at the movie. SO if you feel it necessary to shame local schools in a public forum, at least you should make an attempt to contact the schools and specifically identify their involvement. Oh, and one other thing, maybe the people that planned the event ,should make it more school friendly. After school, youth are involved with sports, jobs and they may have family obligations. Show the movie at the schools, so a plan can be in place to counsel youth if they are emotionally and personally affected after the movie.
You hit the nail on the head, whoooot. One of the important points that people forget is that when they post comments or "like" a public figure, band, or business, their opinions and posts become fair-game and get indexed in major search engines. ...(full comment)
A lot of folks are unaware that "natural gas" and "unconventional gas" are two different things. Yes, for a very long time we have depended on natural gas . . . now we are using "unconventional gas".
More and more of the gas being sold to the public is "unconventional" gas, which is produced using enormous quantities of fresh water, which in turn ruins this water for drinking and creates enormous disposal problems.
A second and more insidious feature is that unconventional gas from the Marcellus shale contains significant amounts of radioactivity, especially when it is coming directly from the shale beds. Marcellus gas is reported to be higher in radioactivity than that found in other shale beds.
Since we are a living very close to the Marcellus and Utica shale plays, this radioactive gas could be shipped in enormous quantities through most of our acquifers and areas that provide drinking water for the state. Pipelines are reported to leak at a rate of 8 to 11%. And because we are a "low population" area hereabouts, there will be even lower than usual standards for pipeline safety in constructing this high pressure, high volume commercial gas shipping line.
Very little of the quantity of this unprocessed gas will go to New England at all. With three high power transmission lines ,aimed through our state, at waiting LNG export (likely targeted to become "import") terminals in Gloucester and Everett Massachusetts, it is very clear that "gas for New England" is likely only a ruse to exploit public necessity arguments and eminent domain to create a shipping route through Massachusetts for the Marcellus to port for sale abroad. The pipeline company proposing this also owns a fleet of gas tankers.
The gas to be shipped in this and the two other proposed pipelines projects, will not only overwhelm the Northeast in quantity, but are clearly destined for sale abroad. This will drive up prices for New England in the long-run, but worse, will bring a lot of deadly radioactivity through our entire state, right into our reservoirs.
The gas industry, and its pipelines are exempt from clean air, clean water, and safe drinking water legislation, since 2005. This was enacted just as hydraulic fracturing was gaining ground. The gas industry spends a considerable amount of money with high priced advertising agencies to promote "clean, safe, natural", which is, in this case, not related to the contents of what will be shipped through Massachusetts.
If this is, indeed, so "safe" then why was this exemption from any oversight or governance given to this industry, when it has such potential to kill so many citizens, ruin water, and create environmental destruction?
And you have to ask yourself whether it is right to destroy public drinking water for private profit. Comparativly little money from all of this will benefit the United States or our state, but it will further enrich private wealth at public expense, as this unconventional gas is likely to sold abroad for private profit.
Massachusetts citizens are unaware that this state may be about to become the shipping and storage lane for enormous quantities of radioactive gas for sale outside the U.S., mostly tobenefit private wealth. The question is, do we as citizens, have any voice in protecting our own safety, and that of our children and grandchildren?
God help us. ...(full comment)
There is a bill banning fracking for 10 years in our state legislation - Bill H3796 currently in the House Ways and Means Committee. In addition, it also calls for a ban of dumping waste water and other waste from fracking in our state (this is really important - Ohio has been a dumping ground for PA fracking waste). Please call your state Reps and Senators to ask them to support this bill and encourage it to come to a vote before July 31. In addition, please sign the petition http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/ban-fracking-in-ma?mailing_id=20804&source=s.icn.em.cr&r_by=6144823 ...(full comment)
You truly care about your patients and want to improve patient care? Abolish the rules of despond and the humiliation you put a patient through all because they suffered a complication from a surgical procedure! ...(full comment)
The Atlantic Monthly talks about how very little supervision or oversight exist in an article from 2013 entitled "No one's really minding the pipeline in your backyard".
Another report (Eric de Place) from www. sightline, retrieved in March of this year, discusses corporate citizenship and community behaviors of KM in its overall operations. One example: "Kinder Morgan subsidiary was convicted of six felony counts related to the Walnut Creek explosion and ordered to pay $15 million in fines." Five people died in a pipeline explosion. This is one of many concerns cited.