Calif. schools prep for transgender rights law
SAN FRANCISCO — With a law that spells out the rights of transgender students in grades K-12 set to take effect in California, school districts are reviewing locker room layouts, scheduling sensitivity training for coaches, assessing who will sleep where during overnight field trips and reconsidering senior portrait dress codes.
But administrators, counselors, teachers and school board members also are watching and waiting. The law, the nation’s first requiring public schools to let children use sex-segregated facilities and participate in the gender-specific activities of their choice, could end up suspended within days of its Jan. 1 launch if a referendum to repeal it qualifies for the November ballot.
“We don’t know what’s going to happen when kids come back from their holiday vacation,” said Republican state Sen. Steve Knight, who voted against the law. “Are there going to be 15-year-old girls talking in the bathroom and in walks a boy? What are they going to do? Scream? Run out?”
The California School Boards Association has advised schools to handle requests on a case-by-case basis and with parental input, if possible, but to be prepared to make private changing arrangements both for transgender students and for classmates who might object to dressing with them.
“We did strike a balance between the sensitivities associated with gender identity, not only for those students who experience a change in their gender status but the students who would be in the same facilities, in the same classrooms and on the same teams,” General Counsel Keith Bray said.
Parent Christy Musser said she plans to take two of her three school-age children out of public schools in Southern California.
“At this time in their lives, these kids are young, innocent and are just learning about themselves and their bodies, and they don’t need to worry about boys coming in the locker room and looking at them, or vice versa,” she said.
San Diego school board president, Kevin Beiser, said those fears are unfounded. In the absence of statewide guidance, schools have been dealing with this challenge “in a very delicate, thoughtful and compassionate manner for many years,” he said.
The possibility that the law could be overturned worries Ashton Lee, 16, a junior at Manteca High School in the San Joaquin Valley. Born a girl, Ashton told his parents and school administrators his sophomore year that he was transgender.
But he said school officials balked when he asked to be transferred from an all-girls aerobics class to a team sports class for boys. “They didn’t understand the seriousness of the issue I was dealing with,” he said. “They treated it like a normal thing, like I didn’t like the class or was bored with the teacher.”
Ashton lobbied for the law last spring and thinks his public activism helped persuade Manteca High to acknowledge his gender identity when school resumed in August. He now is allowed to use the boy’s restrooms and locker rooms and to wear the junior ROTC uniform for male cadets.
Similar adjustments have been made for five transgender classmates.
The law’s passage “showed them this is OK, this is going to be happening in a lot of other places,” he said. “If it gets taken away, I’m kind of worried my school will be like, ‘Well, we don’t have to do it anymore.”